This is the QA environment of the MD-SOAR platform. It is for TESTING PURPOSES ONLY. Navigate to https://mdsoar.org to access the latest open access research from MD-SOAR institutions.
QA Environment
 

New methods for quantifying the effects of catchment spatial patterns on aquatic responses

Thumbnail Image

Files

s10980-023-01706-x.pdf (1.52 MB)
10980_2023_1706_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (456.51 KB)

Links to Files

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-023-01706-x

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01706-x
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/29132

Collections

UMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
UMBC College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Dean's Office
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-0204

Date

2023-07-24

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Weller, D.E., Baker, M.E. & King, R.S. New methods for quantifying the effects of catchment spatial patterns on aquatic responses. Landsc Ecol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01706-x

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Subjects

Abstract

Context Previous studies developed distance-weighted regression to describe how land use effects on aquatic systems attenuate with arrangement of source areas within catchments. Objectives We clarify and extend the conceptual foundations of this approach, enhance the spatial and statistical methods, and provide new tools to interpret the results. Methods We derive the framework from first principles to resolve conceptual issues with how weighting is applied to source area versus total area, and we formalize the requirements for an ideal weighting function. We quantify the spatial distributions of land areas in a way that integrates with model fitting. We adapt non-linear optimization to simultaneously fit regression and weighting parameters. We quantify the spatial distribution of source effects with arrangement and document how different weighting functions alter that distribution. Results To verify their utility, we applied these methods to a published analysis relating polychlorinated biphenyls in fish to developed land use in catchments. We identified a stronger distance-weighted model and more completely characterized the effects of weighting on where aquatic impacts originate. Conclusions Our methods enable more comprehensive analyses of the effects of spatial arrangement to better inform a wide range of scientific investigations and applications. Our methods can relate almost any spatially distributed source or driver to an integrated response at a point or along a boundary; and alternate hypotheses about the effects of pattern or proximity on processes can be tested with alternative weighting functions. New applications will generate additional weighting functions that enhance the general approach.